There are millions of people who don't have access to potable water, not to mention healthcare. In the US, healthcare is so expensive that middle-class unemployed cannot afford it. The democrats are working on improving the system, with no results so far. In communist countries healthcare is free, albeit usually not of the best quality. I was told that in ancient China, people paid their doctor only when healthy, but not when ill, so it was in the doctor's best interest to keep them healthy. What an incredibly clever idea!Since the mandatory healthcare tax was introduced here, we get less for more, but everybody is insured and gets medical care through one of four existing sick funds. The insurance includes a finite number of consultations, lab tests, hospitalization, rehab and a 'basket' of medicine. Naturally, not every possible treatment is included and many hold different gold and platinum insurance plans or private policies to augment the basic coverage.
For historical reasons, dental care is not included in the basic package of any of the sick fund offerings. My private dentist schedules periodical check-ups and hygienist appointments and that seems to work out just fine. The less you use the sick fund service, the more it makes. So why should they tell you about screening tests you are entitled to according to your age group, gender and other criteria? To compensate for the lack of preventive medicine, one should take ownership over test requests and stats. Thanks to my employer, I attend a yearly medical check-up, but the results are not accessible by my GP, I have to bring them to him on paper and make him enter them into his computer, so that he can see the broader picture.
In recent years, since a wealth of medical information is available on the web, the doctor is no longer the only source of information and many look up their symptoms, lab test results and disease information. They read about treatment options and ask their doctor intelligent questions. According to our friend Andrei (the husband of a doctor and father of a med student), doctors will soon be replaced by software that given your symptoms will diagnose your problem. According to a radio program I recently listened to, personalized DNA-based healthcare is around the corner. Everything seems to go in the right direction, so what's wrong then?
My medical pet peeve is personal medical records. You should own them and not the private physicians or organizations that treat you for a certain condition. How? On a smart card or disk-on-key. The different service providers will add their data and the accumulated records will be analyzed by an ever upgraded software application that will provide you with stats and trends, recommend screening tests, remind you to take your prescribed drugs, renew prescriptions, make appointments, suggest further reading and keep you on top of the latest findings, procedures and rights. It shouldn't even cost you since many service providers will be happy to advertise their services based on your location. If you carry it with you at all times it can also be used in emergency situations by ambulance and trauma center personnel. The infrastructure is there, the funding is there, and I don't believe I'm the first or only one on the planet to think about this. So why doesn't it work that way? It takes a few champions to lobby for the initiative with the legislators and fight their way through red tape.
Anybody to take up that [surgical] glove?
Posts
1 comment:
Yes, the technology is there. In fact there are already plans in place (in the United States and Mexico) to implant humans with RFID chips. An RFID chip is a single square millimeter in size, it can be implanted under the skin, and it may be used for storing ID and medical information, something that would greatly help in a case of a medical emergency. But there’s a catch to it. The chip (being developed by PositiveID, formerly VeriChip) can also be used to store financial information and to make transactions, and it can be used to locate and identify you wherever you are, using GPS signals or specific radio frequencies at stores, malls, airports, banks, and virtually everywhere. This raises a real question regarding where does individual privacy end, and what is the cost of being monitored 24-hours a day? Do we really want to get there? Personally I have no doubt that once we get to that stage, some of our most basic personal liberties will fade away, and we will also be more subject to control. Why? The human body is like a machine, an advanced biological machine, but still – subject to the influence of electrical pulses (all our thoughts are electrical pulses our brain), and any foreign electronic device may allow in future upgrades to control our minds in order to (for example) prevent violence, or to prevent some emotions like anger, so that we won’t be angry when our politicians or anybody who has control over us do/does something wrong. Theoretically, if the entire population will have this chip implanted, those who would resist the control system may see their chip being turned off, and they would not be able to enter any public building, buy food, or get medical treatment. I know it may all sound like scary Orwellian science fiction today, but there are real plans to make it happen, and anybody can do his/her own research on the RFID subject via YouTube, Google, Wikipedia or other means. Since I feel it’s a serious issue, I posting this comment on your Facebook page as well.
One thing is for sure: I would go with the old Chinese idea, which sure sounds very good!
Post a Comment